• Canada
  • USA
  • Fossil Fuels
  • About
  • Contact
  • Eco-Anxiety
  • Climate Glossary
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
Subscribe
The Energy Mix
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
Subscribe
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result

Scientists Pan Ontario’s Biodiversity Record, Urge Feds To Review Highway 413

December 9, 2024
Reading time: 3 minutes
Primary Author: Compiled by Gaye Taylor

Danielle Scott/wikimedia commons

Danielle Scott/wikimedia commons

Scientists are calling on the federal government to assess the nature and biodiversity risks posed by Ontario’s Highway 413, a multi-billion-dollar project that would cut through farmland, forests, rivers, and wetlands in a bid to ease traffic congestion around Toronto.

The government’s original commitment to review the project under the federal Impact Assessment Act was thrown into doubt in October, 2023, when the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that some aspects of the law overstepped federal authority.

Now, over 120 researchers are citing Ontario’s “poor track record” on endangered species protection in a letter urging [pdf] Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault to undertake a federal impact assessment of the project. The province is barrelling ahead amid these concerns, and recently passed Bill 212 to fast-track the highway, despite internal warnings that it could risk legal challenges and worsen gridlock, reports The Narwhal.

The letter to Guilbeault is the latest in a multi-year effort to prompt federal action despite pushback from Ontario on jurisdictional grounds. In April, when the federal government reached a deal with the province and created a joint working group to minimize the highway’s environmental impact on federal areas, activists characterized it as Ottawa “retreating” from enforcing its laws.

In the recent letter, the scientists urge the feds must step in and assess a highway that threatens at-risk species, fish habitat, and migratory birds—all three “under clear federal jurisdiction.” Ontario will not take “adequate measures” to protect endangered species, they say, adding that the province has watered down its Endangered Species Act (ESA) by removing protection for species that are endangered in Ontario but also live elsewhere.

Environmental Defence Canada, which published the letter and is leading regional opposition to the project, has also criticized other ESA changes, especially to the Species at Risk conservation trust and fund. “A party is essentially allowed to destroy habitat, even with known species-at-risk in the area, as long as they are paying a charge to the fund as a way to ‘replace’ the lost habitat,” the group wrote in January.

“In the absence of federal action, a proper review of the environmental impacts of the proposed highway will not occur and dozens of federally listed species at risk could be harmed, perhaps irrevocably,” the scientists warn in the letter.

Last month, Environmental Defence formally requested that the Highway 413 project be designated for a federal impact assessment, hours after the Ford government introduced Bill 212. The legislation will allow some stretches of highway construction to begin immediately before authorizations under other provincial acts like the ESA have been issued, and before Indigenous consultation has occurred, the authors say.



in Biodiversity & Habitat, Canada, Cities & Communities, Legal & Regulatory, Ontario, Subnational

Trending Stories

Ian Muttoo/flickr
United States

Ontario Slaps 25% Surcharge on Power Exports as U.S. Commerce Secretary Vows More Tariffs

March 12, 2025
303
Doug Kerr/flickr
Power Grids

New NB-NS Transmission Line Would ‘Take Care of Home’ Through Trump’s Trade War

March 7, 2025
277
LoggaWiggler / Pixabay
Energy Politics

Tariffs Likely to Crater Canadian Crude Exports to U.S., Marathon Tells Investors

March 11, 2025
238

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the climate news you need, delivered direct to your inbox. Sign up for our free e-digest.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

Related Articles

COP16 Produces $200 Billion a Year Plan to Protect Nature

COP16 Produces $200 Billion a Year Plan to Protect Nature

March 3, 2025
Carbon-Sequestering Peatlands Overlooked, Endangered by Human Activity, New Study Warns

Carbon-Sequestering Peatlands Overlooked, Endangered by Human Activity, New Study Warns

February 19, 2025
Restoring Nature Delivers Huge Economic Dividends and Canadians Are Onboard, New Report Says

Restoring Nature Delivers Huge Economic Dividends and Canadians Are Onboard, New Report Says

September 30, 2024

Quicker, Smaller, Better: A Fork in the Road That Delivers a Clean Energy Future

by Mitchell Beer
March 9, 2025

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2025 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_logo
Climate-and-Capital

No Result
View All Result
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.