• Canada
  • USA
  • Fossil Fuels
  • About
  • Contact
  • Eco-Anxiety
  • Climate Glossary
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
Subscribe
The Energy Mix
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
Subscribe
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result

New York’s Congestion Pricing Cuts Traffic But Raises Equity Concerns

February 11, 2025
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Gaye Taylor

Erik Drost/flickr

Erik Drost/flickr

One month into New York City’s congestion pricing scheme, key metrics are trending in the right direction but the city’s poorest borough fears exposure to yet more toxic air pollution as commercial trucks reroute to avoid the tolls.

This mixed outcome offers lessons for Canadian cities like Vancouver and Toronto, where a similar model could ease traffic and fund transit but faces political hurdles.

Figures from New York’s Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) suggest that 16% fewer cars entered Manhattan’s Central Business District in January compared to 2024, reports Untapped New York. For comparison, vehicle traffic dropped 18% in the first year of London’s flagship congestion pricing scheme, launched in 2003.

Commutes are also improving, with inbound trips from the Hudson and East Rivers 10% to 30% faster than this time last year, and outbound trips accelerating by a whopping 59% in some places. Buses are also moving faster, with express buses shedding as much as 10 minutes off their routes.

And more riders are on these buses, with the MTA reporting a 6% bump on weekday express buses, 21% on the weekends. Non-express ridership is also up, though in smaller increments: 1.5% on weekdays, 8% on weekends.

Fewer vehicles will likely translate into cleaner air for Manhattanites, with the MTA expecting a decline in all categories of toxic air pollution, from volatile organic compounds to PM2.5 particulate matter.

But not every New Yorker will be breathing easier, writes Inside Climate News. Concern is especially high for residents in the South Bronx.

One of the nation’s poorest neighborhoods, South Bronx has long been overburdened with traffic and corresponding levels of air pollution, especially along the six-lane, east-to-west Cross Bronx Expressway (CBE) that cuts across the northern part of the borough. Five kilometres to the south, Bruckner Boulevard is “another corridor of concern,” NYC transport and traffic expert Charles Komanoff told The Energy Mix.

MTA planners had anticipated that congestion pricing might push more commercial truck traffic onto the CBE, the New York Times wrote in 2022. It was an outcome of concern for the 220,000 people who live along the expressway, the vast majority of them poor and people of colour, who would face higher levels of toxic pollution. The authority briefly considered a flat toll for all vehicles hoping to limit the volume of rerouted trucks, but ditched this strategy on grounds that it would undercut benefits in the congestion zone. Policymakers ultimately landed on upwards of US$14 for trucks, compared to $9 for cars. By MTA figures, worst-case scenarios would see PM 2.5 concentrations around the Bronx expressway increase to 11 micrograms per cubic metre, up from 10.9, remaining just below 12 micrograms, the Environmental Protection Agency’s mandated maximum for long-term exposure to the toxin.

Harvard public health professor Francesca Dominici warned that even such a seemingly small increase would be significant for populations whose respiratory health is already compromised.

“Considering that the South Bronx is an area with already high asthma rates and other pre-existing health conditions, even a small increase in long-term exposure to particulate matter will exacerbate these health outcomes,” Dominici told the Times.

Fast forward three years, and congestion pricing is now in place. But it can’t be advanced on the backs of the most vulnerable, says Mychal Johnson, co-founder of the environmental advocacy group South Bronx Unite that advised the MTA on the program.

“We are for reducing congestion,” Johnson told Inside Climate. “We just can’t be the shoulder-bearers of when they reduce it at other locations. Our community is suffering.”

Even one more truck is one truck too many, Johnson added.

Meanwhile, in notoriously congested Vancouver, transit experts say weak political will is holding the city back from implementing a homegrown version of congestion pricing that would secure the future of its transit system, reports CBC News. A C$3 downtown charge could generate over $1 billion annually and cut congestion by 20%, concluded a 2018 study by the regional transportation authority, TransLink.

Without new funding, TransLink faces service cuts this year. Toronto sees similar resistance, with Ontario’s Doug Ford government opposing congestion pricing citing public pushback and concerns over transit capacity.

London solved that problem by investing in transit capacity for three years before introducing congestion pricing, writes CBC News. Its pricing model reduced congestion by 30% in the core and eventually led to a nearly 40% increase in bus passengers.



in Cities & Communities, Climate Equity & Justice, Community Climate Finance, Health & Safety, Legal & Regulatory, Transit, United States

Trending Stories

ILRI/flickr
Health & Safety

What Climate Change Means for Bird Flu—And the Soaring Price of Eggs

March 10, 2025
356
Antalexion/wikimedia commons
Solar

‘Farming Sunshine’ Brings Food, Power Producers Together for Local Baaa-nefit

March 10, 2025
321
Ian Muttoo/flickr
United States

Ontario Slaps 25% Surcharge on Power Exports as U.S. Commerce Secretary Vows More Tariffs

March 11, 2025
290

Comments 2

  1. Tom says:
    1 month ago

    Equity. Lol. It’s not cool to use that word anymore.

    Reply
    • Mitchell Beer says:
      1 month ago

      All the more reason to keep using it, every chance we get. I also hear tell that Elon Musk is furious that people have been calling Teslas “Swasticars” since the inauguration. It really sends him into a rage. So, as someone said online…don’t do that. 😇

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the climate news you need, delivered direct to your inbox. Sign up for our free e-digest.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

Related Articles

Basic Income Could Cut Poverty Up to 40%: PBO

Basic Income Could Cut Poverty Up to 40%: PBO

February 26, 2025
Trump Could Kill Funding for Life-Saving Local Resiliency Hubs

Trump Could Kill Funding for Life-Saving Local Resiliency Hubs

December 16, 2024
Undocumented Workers Take Central Role in U.S. Climate Disaster Recovery

Undocumented Workers Take Central Role in U.S. Climate Disaster Recovery

October 30, 2024

Quicker, Smaller, Better: A Fork in the Road That Delivers a Clean Energy Future

by Mitchell Beer
March 9, 2025

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2025 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_logo
Climate-and-Capital

No Result
View All Result
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.