• Canada
  • USA
  • Fossil Fuels
  • About
  • Contact
  • Eco-Anxiety
  • Climate Glossary
No Result
View All Result
The Energy Mix
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
Subscribe
The Energy Mix
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance
Subscribe
The Energy Mix
No Result
View All Result

Fracking Bigwig Barred from Exxon Board Amid Price-Fixing Allegations

May 14, 2024
Reading time: 4 minutes
Primary Author: Christopher Bonasia

Minale Tattersfield/flickr

Minale Tattersfield/flickr

An American oil boss has been barred from ExxonMobil’s board of directors over his alleged involvement in a price-fixing scheme now facing numerous lawsuits.

The United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) moved to prevent founder and former CEO of Pioneer Natural Resources Scott Sheffield from gaining a seat on Exxon’s board or serving the company in an advisory capacity after it acquired Pioneer, the agency said in a news release. The condition for the merger “seeks to prevent Pioneer’s Sheffield from engaging in collusive activity that would potentially raise crude oil prices, leading American consumers and businesses to pay higher prices for gasoline, diesel fuel, heating oil and jet fuel.”

Sheffield’s past conduct “makes it crystal clear that he should be nowhere near Exxon’s boardroom,” said Kyle Mach, deputy director of the FTC’s Bureau of Competition. “American consumers shouldn’t pay unfair prices at the pump simply to pad a corporate executive’s pocketbook.”

The order is intended to resolve antitrust concerns regarding the merger, which will increase consolidation in the oil and gas industry. Sheffield, and CEOs of several other oil companies, allegedly sidestepped U.S. antitrust legislation to cooperate with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to inflate prices. Their actions cost Americans around $2,100 per person in 2021 and accounted for roughly 27% of inflation from corporate profits that same year, according to one estimate.

OPEC members have historically controlled global oil prices by cooperating to collectively increase or decrease production. But it is illegal for U.S. producers to do this under federal legislation, the Sherman and Clayton Acts, preventing anti-competitive business practices.

The alleged collusion with OPEC undermined the competition between the U.S. and OPEC countries which has defined the global oil market since early 2000s, when the “shale revolution” turned the U.S. into a leading oil exporter, the FTC said. At that time, technological advances in hydraulic fracking and horizontal drilling gave U.S. companies, led by Sheffield’s Pioneer, access to vast reserves of shale oil. This enabled the U.S. to compete with OPEC, constraining global oil prices by American antitrust laws rather than the cartel activity of other oil producers.

OPEC attempted to respond by taking on new members and creating an expanded OPEC+ with countries like Russia, but it was unable to regain its substantial influence in the market. Then, in 2020, a sudden decline in fossil fuel demand followed the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to oversupply and a drastic price drop, with the value of a barrel of oil briefly falling to -US$37.63. After that, the FTC asserts that at least six U.S. companies named in a complaint filed April 15—including Pioneer, Occidental, Diamondback Energy, and others—began communicating with OPEC countries about ending their price war. Hundreds of texts, WhatsApp messages, and in-person communications from Sheffield to OPEC leaders show them coordinating to affect oil pricing and production, the FTC says.

This communication evolved into collaboration to scale down production and keep the price of crude oil artificially high, the agency adds. Though the strong market for oil at the time would normally entice companies to ramp up their output, Sheffield and others held back, citing supply “discipline.”

“There’s no change for us,” Sheffield told investors on a public earnings call in February 2022. “$100 oil, $150 oil, we’re not going to change our growth rate.”

The price-fixing plan was spearheaded by independent producers and was not pursued by oil majors like Exxon and Chevron, which seized the opportunity to expand their shale oil production while other companies limited supply.

Still, the FTC’s actions have reportedly “rattled” the oil and gas industry, prompting other companies with pending deals to re-evaluate their strategies to avoid similar orders. The evidence cited by the agency has also prompted a slew of class-action lawsuits seeking damages related to the price fixing scheme.

The FTC order comes as oil and gas companies are increasingly under pressure from Democratic lawmakers, who are adopting a hard line against fossil fuels as President Joe Biden campaigns for re-election this November. Meanwhile, Biden’s opponent in the election—Donald Trump—has been actively courting fossil fuel companies, asking for $1 billion in campaign funding in return for executive orders to roll back environmental regulations affecting the industry, reports Politico.

The companies seem unsure of making such a deal—possibly over concerns that Trump’s erratic foreign policies would undermine their business—but they are also reportedly drafting executive orders for Trump to sign if he enters office next year.



in Carbon Pricing, Energy Politics, Energy Poverty, Finance & Investment, Fracking & LNG, Legal & Regulatory, Middle East, Oil & Gas, United States

Trending Stories

Ian Muttoo/flickr
United States

Ontario Slaps 25% Surcharge on Power Exports as U.S. Commerce Secretary Vows More Tariffs

March 12, 2025
313
Doug Kerr/flickr
Power Grids

New NB-NS Transmission Line Would ‘Take Care of Home’ Through Trump’s Trade War

March 7, 2025
282
LoggaWiggler / Pixabay
Energy Politics

Tariffs Likely to Crater Canadian Crude Exports to U.S., Marathon Tells Investors

March 11, 2025
242

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I agree to the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Get the climate news you need, delivered direct to your inbox. Sign up for our free e-digest.

Subscribe Today

View our latest digests

Related Articles

Oil Exec Takes Charge of Alberta Regulator, Stoking Fears of Industry Capture

Oil Exec Takes Charge of Alberta Regulator, Stoking Fears of Industry Capture

February 24, 2025
Lawsuits in Scotland, Ireland Slow Down New Oilfields, Allow New Wind Farm Development

Lawsuits in Scotland, Ireland Slow Down New Oilfields, Allow New Wind Farm Development

February 4, 2025
U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Fossils’ Bid to Block City Lawsuit for Climate Liability

U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Fossils’ Bid to Block City Lawsuit for Climate Liability

January 24, 2025

Quicker, Smaller, Better: A Fork in the Road That Delivers a Clean Energy Future

by Mitchell Beer
March 9, 2025

…

Follow Us

Copyright 2025 © Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Copyright
  • Cookie Policy

Proudly partnering with…

scf_logo
Climate-and-Capital

No Result
View All Result
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}
No Result
View All Result
  • Cities & Communities
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Heat & Power
  • Community Climate Finance

Copyright 2025 © Smarter Shift Inc. and Energy Mix Productions Inc. All rights reserved.